Kham Wa Essays - Philosophy Of Religion, Atheism, Religion

Kham Wa Prof. Thomas EN 110 November 7, 2016 Atheism is a Better Way of Living Atheism is a way of thinking that appears to be growing more and more as people begin to recognize that they can live their lives without the need to believe in a god or gods. The rise of people choosing atheism is due largely because of the impairments that theism has brought down on society with its teachings. Although some feel like religion is needed in order to teach people the proper way of living and the hope afterlife "Without the hope of immortality or life after death, there is no ultimate point to human existence" (Chittom, Lynn-nore, and Donnelly), others disagree, affirming that "religions tend to think morality is more about belief than behavior, and view this life as preparation for an imagined afterlife" (Issitt, Micah, and Wagner). Atheism may be based on philosophical, logical, or pragmatic principles that promote free will, intellectual development, and social harmony. In contrast, organized religion has been a major factor in the perpetuation of violence between n ations, oppression, abuse of power, sexual misconduct, and cultural clashes within societies. It's full of hypocrisy, goes against science, violates some human freedoms, and is full of fundamentalists who seek to do harm in the name of their deity. Theism comes from the word Theos, which in Greek means "God". The God also transcends the world, but takes an active interest in it. Chittom, Lynn-nore, and Donnelly define theism as "the belief in the existence of God or gods, specifically a divine source responsible for the creation of life, and frequently thought of as transcending the world while also having a presence in it." Theism also reveals purpose for human beings, and this is done with miraculous events, sacred writings, and through particular people. God is also considered personal if he can be understood by analogies, which are drawn from human experience. Also is done if human beings can enter into a personal relation with him. With such a God, he is considered full of power. Because, he is believed to be perfect and infinitely powerful. In simple words, Theism is the belief in any God whose qualities are following by the people. Catholicism, Jewish, Muslims, and Buddhism are some examples of religions in which people believe in God. In contrast with theism is atheism. Atheism comes from the prefix "a", meaning "without", and the Greek word Theos. Atheism is the denial or the lack of a God. Atheist simply do not believe in a God, and they try to prove the inexistence of God to the others. As Issit, Micah, and Wagner defined "Atheism is a philosophical idea that is generally defined as a disbelief, or denial of the existence of God or gods." Most atheist have a good sense of humor. So here's a joke told by Silverman about the kind of atheist he isa Jewish atheist. "A Jewish atheist hears that the best school in town happens to be Catholic, so he enrolls his son. Things are going well until one day the boy comes home and says, I learned about the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.' The boy's father, barely able to control his rage, grabs his son by the shoulders and says: Joey, this is very important, so listen carefully. There is only one God - and we don't believe in him!'" By choosing an atheistic viewpoint, individuals take responsibility for their destiny, and when death comes upon the person, it marks the end of the person's existence. In addition, atheism refers to people who need analytical and scientific proof to believe in one action, and they choose the right to develop their own morals and guidelines. In his article, Silverman explained "We are guided by the expected consequences of our actions. We are committed to the application of reason, science, and experience to better understand the universe and solve problems. The plight of the human raceindeed, of the planetis in our hands, and social problems can be solved by methods that we develop and test." The terms negative and positive atheism have been used in the philosophical literature and in Catholic apologetics. Under this demarcation of atheism: Positive atheism is the explicit

Torture Is Never Justified

Torture Is Never Justified Torture through the History The concept of torture is at the base of many conflicts that take place throughout the country. In fact, it began in ancient times with the Romans and Greeks forcing their prisoners to participate in some of the worst forms of torture we’ve ever known. Since that time, countries around the world have used everything from ‘the rack,’ tar and feathering, stoning, waterboarding and much more to torture others whether for the purpose of gaining information or simply as a method of slowly killing a prisoner. For any purpose, however, torture has never been able to be justified, at any point in our history and most definitely will not be at any point in our future. Torture Is Often Useless Many claim that torture can be justified because it comes down to the safety of the people. They believe that torturing someone in order to gain information that could potentially save lives is acceptable or even reasonable, however, this is not the case. In fact, torture is often used on those labeled as ‘traitors’ for this very purpose but is not often as effective as many would have us believe. This is because those who are being tortured, those who may know something that we would want them to divulge, are also highly trained to ignore the torture and to fight through it as long as they need to until death. As a result, the torture is being done on an individual for no purpose but perhaps a level of sadism on the part of the captor. Despite what we may be told, there is little if anything to be gained by the process. Yet another problem that arises with the concept of torture is at what point does it end? In many countries, torture is allowed for different types of crimes. In the United States, only those accused of being terrorists or prisoners of war are allowed to be tortured, yet only the accusation and not actual proof is needed. In other countries, crimes less than terrorism can be punished by torture and in still others, a crime is not even needed to enact torture on the basis of a simple belief. How could it be possible to even for those who believe in torture in some instances to say that torture is allowed in all  instances per justice? And this is where the struggle begins. Because the more that torture is defended and allowed in one situation, the more others will clamor for it to be allowed in all situations. After all, every criminal situation is looking to help people, to protect people. Want to know more? Go here: When Is Military Force Justified? Single-Parent Children Behaviour Causes of Human Errors in Aircraft Accidents Human Dignity   Sample Essay about Happiness What Is the Value of Human Life? The truth of the matter is that it is not only the government that participates in torture. There are also many instances of vigilante justice where the people of a country or area will join together to enact some type of vengeance on a person they perceive to have done something wrong. These individuals could be tortured with no more evidence against them than public opinion and yet, by attempting to justify torture in some senses, we are opening the door to these types of torture in any sense. The most important matter, however, that arises in this question, is that of human life. The value of human life, of human wellbeing, is written into the Constitution of the United States, ‘the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’ The life and ‘pursuit of happiness’ for all people is important to us and has always been. But through torture, we strip individuals of their life and their liberty and their pursuit of happiness with the thought that, because we believe them to have done something bad, they are somehow less human. When viewing this issue of torture it is important to remember that there have been changes to it throughout time. Originally, very little was needed in order to implement torture on anyone. Over time, we have narrowed down the reasons and this is a step in the right direction. However, we have not eliminated the process altogether and this is an important next step for us to take. Torture cannot be allowed to continue in any nation that would call itself civilized because, despite what we may be told, there is no justice to be found in torture.

Can an effective crisis management plan in PR be prepared beforehand Essay

Can an effective crisis management plan in PR be prepared beforehand - Essay Example The aim of crisis management plan is to reduce the damage that occurs from crisis. Public Relation strategies for crisis management help to limit the damage that occurs due to crisis. Organizations should monitor the facts due to which the crisis occurred and listen to their stakeholders during a crisis situation. Management of the crisis by deciding on the key messages is exceptionally important as it is the best way to reach each group quickly. Managing spokesperson and responding to media quickly is also essential to reduce effects of crisis. A quick response regarding a crisis situation does not allow public and media to speculate rumours. Rumours are very dangerous because they impact the brand image of an organization. It is also important for employers and managers to develop proper platform that can help to prepare an appropriate communication with different stakeholders. Most of the organizations, in the contemporary era emphasize on the development of crisis management plan that can be incorporated beforehand. Public Relation has become an important tool for business organizations, non-profit and government organization because it helps to limit the chances of crisis related situations. While crisis cannot be avoided by organizations every time but with appropriate planning with help of public relation strategies and preparations, they can be managed. Marketing experts have many different opinions regarding the planning and execution of crisis management planning in Public Relations. Some people believe that crisis management planning cannot be incorporated beforehand, which is not appropriate. This essay elabor ates the crisis management techniques and provides evidences that prove that those techniques can be implemented before crisis occurs in organizations. There was a lack of implementation of theories on Public Relation practices in the past. This factor limited the research as there were no guidelines set for crafting